Nanofilm and FiberFilm both cut the plastic on every pallet. The right choice depends on what you wrap and how you wrap it. Here’s how to decide.
What they have in common
Both films put less plastic on each pallet than traditional machine film while still holding loads securely. That means lower film use, fewer reel changes and a lower cost per pallet, without sacrificing load stability.
When FiberFilm is the better fit
FiberFilm is reinforced from within, for heavy, tall or awkward loads. Each pallet uses up to 60% less plastic, holds just as securely, and the film doesn’t break mid-wrap. With less film, fewer reel changes and no downtime from breaks, the cost per pallet comes down by up to 40%.
When Nanofilm is the better fit
Nanofilm is built from 67 nano-layers for demanding, high-volume machine wrapping. It gives high holding force, consistent performance at speed and stretch of up to 380%, from 10 microns thin.
At a glance
| FiberFilm | Nanofilm |
|---|
| Best for | Heavy, tall or awkward loads | Demanding, high-volume machine wrapping |
| Strength from | Reinforcement within the film | 67 nano-layers |
| Headline result | Up to 60% less plastic per pallet; cost per pallet down up to 40% | From 10 microns thin, with stretch of up to 380% |
Compare all our machine stretch film ranges side by side: Nanofilm, FiberFilm and 250%.
Still not sure? Test both
We recommend the film that wins on your pallets, not the one we prefer. We’ll trial Nanofilm and FiberFilm against your current film on your own line and show you, in writing, which gives you the best containment, cost per pallet and consistency. Book a free benchmark.
Resources
